Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in cardiac amyloidosis. A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Conventional right ventricle (RV) pacemaker stimulation has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Left bundle branch area pacing (LABPP) has been suggested as a promising alternative. We sought to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of LABPP in patients with CA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed echocardiography and pacing parameters and clinical outcomes in 23 consecutive patients with CA and LBBAP implanted from June 2020 to October 2022. RESULTS: LBBAP was successfully performed in 22 over 23 patients (19 male, 78.6 ± 11.7 years, 20 ATTR, mean LVEF 45.5 ± 16.2%). After the procedure, 9 patients showed Qr pattern and 11 a qR pattern in V1 on ECG. Average procedure time was 67 ± 28 min. After 7.7 ± 5.2 months follow-up, no procedure-related complications had occurred. Although, a significant reduction in QRS width (p = .001) was achieved, we did not observe significant changes in LVEF and Nt ProBNP at 6 months of follow-up. Pacing parameters were stable during follow-up: LBB capture threshold and R wave amplitude were 1.0 ±  0.5 V and 10.6 ± 6.0 mV versus 0.8 ±  0.1 V, p = .21 and 10.6 ± 5.1 mV (p = .985) at follow up. CONCLUSION: LBBAP is safe and feasible pacing technique for patients with CA. LBBAP is associated with significant narrowing of QRSd without worsening in LVEF and Nt-proBNP.

Efficacy and safety of Proglide use and early discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation compared to standard approach. PROFA trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The common practice after atrial fibrillation ablation is to admit patients for an overnight stay. The aim of this study was to compare a strategy of vascular suture mediated closure system utilization and early discharge (strategy A) compared to traditional closure and overnight hospitalization (strategy B) regarding feasibility, safety, quality of life and health care cost effectiveness. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hundred patients were randomized to compare both strategies. No clinical differences were reported except diabetes mellitus. Six patients (6%) had and emergency visit or were admitted in the first 30 days after procedure. Three occurred in strategy A versus three in strategy B (p = 1) (p < .005 for non-inferiority). Forty out of 50 patients (80%) were safely discharged in a time frame of 3 h and 42 patients (84%) were discharged in the same day of the procedure in strategy A. Time to discharge was shorter in strategy A compared to strategy B. (5.89 ± 7.47 h vs. 27.09 ± 2.29 p < .005). No differences were obtained in quality-of-life outcomes. Mean (95% CI) euros cost saving per patient in strategy A was 379.16 ± 93.55 p < .001. Ten acute complications (10% patients CI 95% 4.02%-15.98%) were reported during the trial. Seven (14% CI 95% 4.04%-23.96%) occurred in strategy A patients versus 3 (6% CI 95% 0.8%-12.8%) in strategy B. (p = .182) CONCLUSION: A strategy of vascular suture mediated closure system utilization and early discharge was feasible, reduced time to discharge, saved costs and was not associated with more complications or admissions/emergency visits in a 30-day time frame after procedure compared to a strategy of regular admission and discharge after overnight stay. There were no differences regarding quality-of-life parameters between both strategies.

Incidencia, tasa de éxito, complicaciones y factores predictores de empleo de la vía femoral en procedimientos percutáneos de extracción de electrodos / Incidence, success rate, complications and predictive factors of the use of the femoral route for the removal of the electrodes after percutaneous procedures

Resumen Introducción: en los procedimientos de extracción de electrodos, la vía femoral se usa cuando la vía superior ha fracasado. Objetivo: describir la incidencia, el éxito, las complicaciones y los predictores de uso de la vía femoral. Métodos: se realizó un análisis de la incidencia del uso de la vía femoral y los factores predictores en pacientes a quienes se les realizó extracción de electrodos entre noviembre de 2011 y noviembre de 2017. Resultados: se incluyeron 85 pacientes, con edad media de 62,36 ± 11,15 años. El 38,9% de los dispositivos eran marcapasos. Se extrajeron 135 electrodos, 59,3% de fijación pasiva. La mediana de tiempo desde el implante fue de 102 (60-174) meses. Se empleó la ruta femoral en el 25,9% de los procedimientos. Se obtuvo éxito clínico en el 92,9% de los pacientes. La extracción no fue exitosa en el 22,7% de los procedimientos cuando se usó la vía femoral, en comparación con el 1,6% cuando se usó la vía superior (p 0,004). La extracción no fue completa en el 36,4% de los procedimientos cuando se empleó la vía femoral en comparación con el 9,5% por vía superior (p 0,007). Los factores que predijeron el empleo de la ruta femoral fueron la presencia de electrodos de fijación pasiva [OR IC 95% 13,69 (3,06-62,5) p 0,001] y el tiempo desde el implante del electrodo [OR IC 95% por cada 10 meses 1,04 (1,00-1,09) p 0,044]. Conclusiones: se empleó la ruta femoral en el 25,9% de los procedimientos. No fue eficaz en el 22,7% de las intervenciones. Los factores que predijeron su utilización fueron la presencia de electrodos de fijación pasiva y el tiempo desde el implante del electrodo.

Abstract Introduction: The femoral route is used in electrode removal procedures when the upper route has failed. Objective: To describe the incidence, success rate, complications and predictive factors for the use of the femoral route. Methods: An analysis was performed on the incidence of use of the femoral route and the predictive factors in patients in whom electrode removal was carried out between November 2011 and November 2017. Results: The study included 85 patients with a mean age of 62.36 ± 11.5 years. Pacemakers made up 38.9% of the devices. A total of 135 electrodes, 59.3% of passive fixation, were removed. The median time since the implant was 102 (60-174) months. The femoral route was used in 25.9% of the procedures. Clinical success was achieved in 92.9% of the patients. The removal was not successful in 22.7% of the procedures when the femoral route was used, compared to 1.6% when the upper route was used (P = .004). The removal was not completed in 36.4% of the procedures when the femoral route was used, compared to 9.5% with the upper route (P = .007). The factors that predicted the use of the femoral route were the presence of passive-fixation electrodes (OR = 13.69: 95% CI; 3.06 - 62.5, P = .001), and the time since the electrodes were implanted (OR = 1.04, 95% CI; 1.00 - 1.09, P = .044, for every 10 months). Conclusions: The femoral route was employed in 25.9% of the procedures. It was not effective in 22.7% of the interventions. The factors that predicted its use were the presence of passive-fixation electrodes and the time since the electrode implant.

[Bayes' syndrome in cardiac surgery: prevalence of interatrial block in patients younger than 65 years undergoing cardiac surgery and association with postoperative atrial fibrillation]. / Síndrome de Bayés en cirugía cardiaca: prevalencia de bloqueo interauricular en menores de 65 años sometidos a cirugía cardiaca y su asociación con fibrilación auricular en el postoperatorio.

OBJECTIVE: Interatrial block (IAB) is a well-known entity that is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). This association is called Bayes' syndrome. The aim of our study was to define the prevalence of IAB among patients younger than 65 years undergoing cardiac surgery and determine whether there is an association between the presence of interatrial conduction delay and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). METHOD: A total of 207 patients were enrolled. Partial IAB was defined as P-wave>120ms. Advanced IAB was defined as P-wave>120ms+biphasic morphology in the inferior leads. Ocurrence of POAF was assessed and a comparative analysis was conducted between patients that did and did not develop AF. RESULTS: IAB prevalence was 78.3% (partial 66.2%, advanced 12.1%). POAF occurred in 28.5% of all patients, and was more frequent among patients with advanced IAB (44%) compared to 27.7% and 24.4% of POAF among patients with partial IAB and without IAB, respectively. Patients who developed POAF were significantly older, had significantly higher NTproBNP, higher prevalence of atrial enlargement and thyroid disease. After multivariate analysis, advanced IAB was found to be independently associated with POAF. CONCLUSIONS: IAB is a frequent finding among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. According to our results, advanced IAB is independently associated with POAF in younger patients (<65 years) undergoing cardiac surgery.

Síndrome de Bayés en cirugía cardiaca: prevalencia de bloqueo interauricular en menores de 65 años sometidos a cirugía cardiaca y su asociación con fibrilación auricular en el postoperatorio / Bayes' syndrome in cardiac surgery: prevalence of interatrial block in patients younger than 65 years undergoing cardiac surgery and association with postoperative atrial fibrillation

Resumen Objetivo: El bloqueo interauricular (BIA) es una entidad asociada con un mayor riesgo de presentar fibrilación auricular (FA), constituyendo el denominado síndrome de Bayés. El objetivo de nuestro estudio fue definir la prevalencia de BIA en pacientes menores de 65 años sometidos a cirugía cardiaca y determinar si existe una asociación entre la presencia de BIA y la aparición de FA postoperatoria. Método: Se incluyeron un total de 207 pacientes. Se definió BIA parcial como onda P > 120 ms. Se definió BIA avanzado como onda P > 120 ms con morfología bifásica en derivaciones inferiores. Se determinó la frecuencia de aparición de FA postoperatoria y se realizó un análisis comparativo entre los pacientes que presentaron y los que no presentaron esta arritmia. Resultados: La prevalencia de BIA fue del 78.3% (parcial, 66.2%; avanzado, 12.1%). La frecuencia de aparición de FA fue del 28.5% de forma global, siendo mayor en los pacientes con BIA avanzado (44%) comparado con pacientes con BIA parcial (27.7%) y sin BIA (24.4%). Los pacientes que presentaron FA fueron significativamente mayores, con niveles más elevados de NTproBNP y presentaron mayor prevalencia de dilatación auricular y de patología tiroidea. El análisis multivariable demostró una asociación independiente entre BIA avanzado y FA postoperatoria. Conclusiones: El BIA es una entidad frecuente en pacientes sometidos a cirugía cardiaca. En nuestro estudio, el BIA avanzado se asocia de forma independiente con una mayor frecuencia de FA postoperatoria en pacientes menores de 65 años sometidos a cirugía cardiaca.

Abstract Objective: Interatrial block (IAB) is a well-known entity that is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). This association is called Bayes' syndrome. The aim of our study was to define the prevalence of IAB among patients younger than 65 years undergoing cardiac surgery and determine whether there is an association between the presence of interatrial conduction delay and postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF). Method: A total of 207 patients were enrolled. Partial IAB was defined as P-wave > 120 ms. Advanced IAB was defined as P-wave > 120 ms + biphasic morphology in the inferior leads. Ocurrence of POAF was assessed and a comparative analysis was conducted between patients that did and did not develop AF. Results: IAB prevalence was 78.3% (partial 66.2%, advanced 12.1%). POAF occurred in 28.5% of all patients, and was more frequent among patients with advanced IAB (44%) compared to 27.7% and 24.4% of POAF among patients with partial IAB and without IAB, respectively. Patients who developed POAF were significantly older, had significantly higher NTproBNP, higher prevalence of atrial enlargement and thyroid disease. After multivariate analysis, advanced IAB was found to be independently associated with POAF. Conclusions: IAB is a frequent finding among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. According to our results, advanced IAB is independently associated with POAF in younger patients (< 65 years) undergoing cardiac surgery.

Mixoma gigante de la aurícula derecha / Giant right atrial myxoma

Los tumores primarios del corazón son raros, con una incidencia estimada de 0,0017-0,19 porciento.Los mixomas cardíacos son los más frecuentes (50 porciento). La localización en la aurícula derecha es inusual y ocurre solo en el 15-20 porciento de los casos. Su presentación clínica puede ser asintomática, con presencia de síntomas constitucionales o dependientes de una obstrucción cardíaca o un embolismo pulmonar. Presentamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 36 años de edad con historia de astenia, palpitaciones y disminución de la capacidad funcional. La ecocardiografía transtorácica mostró una gran masa en la aurícula derecha, prolapsando al interior del ventrículo derecho y obstruyendo la válvula tricúspide. El paciente fue sometido a cirugía de bypass cardiopulmonar y la masa (9 Î 9 cm) fue extirpada sin complicaciones. El examen histológico confirmó el diagnóstico de mixoma

Primary tumors of the heart are rare, their estimated incidence ranging between 0.0017-0.19 percent, and among them cardiac myxomas are the most common (50 percent). Right atrial localization is uncommon, occurring only in 15-20 percent of cases. Their clinical presentation ranges from an asymptomatic status to the presence of constitutional symptoms or symptoms pointing to the presence of cardiac obstruction or pulmonary embolism. A case is presented of a 36-year-old male patient with a history of asthenia, palpitations and reduced functional capacity. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a large mass in the right atrium which prolapsed into the right ventricle and obstructed the tricuspid valve. The patient underwent cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and the mass (9x9 cm) was removed without any complication. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of myxoma